買金條最保值 要保值就不買車 買車...其一是用車 其二是玩樂 我只會買自己喜歡的車 |
当然是保时捷,绝对的保值哈 |
本帖最后由 Kampfer 于 2014-10-8 14:22 编辑 安睡如婴 发表于 2014-10-5 21:29 Your question is about "最保值", affordability was not part of the question. As you've said people who consider Q5 will not look at Lancer, so what's the point comparing them? I brought the point up because you mentioned Q5 and Lancer in your comparison. Which IMO is manipulating data in order to make Q5 sound better than it is. (I have nothing again Audi.) When comparing depreciation by percentage, comparison should only be vailded between cars with similar market price. My 0.02c |
Q5、大切?老外很喜欢修车么 |
本帖最后由 Kampfer 于 2014-9-9 09:07 编辑 The logic is flawed. Q5 is ~$70k new, from the graph Q5 worth 60% ($42k), you lose $28k. Lancer is ~$22k new, loss 62% mean $13.5k Lancer is much, MUCH cheaper to run and service with 5 yr warranty. You save more money with Lancer. Buy a new Suzuki Alto for $12k, dump the car in 5 years and buy another one, dump it again in 5 years and still cost less than a Q5... Depreciation should calculate in $, not %. |
四驱车相对后驱或者前驱更保值 柴油相对汽油更保值 可是偏爱汽油后驱车 |